Strategic planning consultations

You can view all available strategic planning consultations. To make a comment on a current consultation you must sign in to your account.

Representations on New Local Plan Options - Sustainability Appraisal Interim Report - Sections 1-19, Appendix A, Appendix B

Representation ID: 5080

COMMENT IDI Gazeley represented by Now Planning (Ms Nora Galley)

Summary:

Section 13
Failure to to assess the strategic distribution Options A-C in the SA Interim Report (Options Consultation) could raise implications for; legal compliance of the Local Plan with the Duty to Cooperate and with the SA/SEA Directive, and means the public have been given nothing accessible to go on.

Representation ID: 5079

COMMENT IDI Gazeley represented by Now Planning (Ms Nora Galley)

Summary:

Section 13
To be legally compliant the final report of the SA/SEA will need to explain why, in each case, the strategic Options A-C have been chosen or dropped in the final draft plan.

Representation ID: 5078

COMMENT IDI Gazeley represented by Now Planning (Ms Nora Galley)

Summary:

Section 13
SEA Directive 2001/42/EC requires all reasonable alternatives to be considered and for the final choice of options (both those progressed and rejected) to be justified on the basis of their environmental, economic and social effects.

Representation ID: 4775

COMMENT Natural England (Mr Sean Mahoney)

Summary:

We note the conclusions of the Sustainability Appraisal Interim Report in relation to the 9 options for housing locations and employment. Our concerns about the Lutterworth Strategic Development Area (SDA) in view of its potential impact on Misterton Marshes SSSI are as follows:
Natural England would like to raise serious concerns about the potential Strategic Development Area at Lutterworth given its proximity to Misterton Marshes SSSI. It is highly likely that large-scale residential and associated development in this area would have significant hydrological and other impacts on the SSSI, including human footfall, which could damage or destroy the interest features for which it is notified.

Representation ID: 2765

COMMENT Historic England (Claire Searson)

Summary:

We are very concerned that our comments have not been taken forward as we considered the assessment process as set out to be flawed. We are particularly concerned that a small proximity gauge of 50m distance from heritage asset was used under BH1 as a measure of impact. We do not support the use of such means to identify impacts as distance is not a measure of harm. There is also a concern that the assessment omits non-designated heritage assets such as archeology.

Representation ID: 893

OBJECT Mr Raymond Godfrey

Summary:

Resilience to climate change - Pages 26/27 - Dunton Bassett.
There is already a water run off problem with the potential Loves Lane development site. After heavy rain, water floods off the field and down the drive of 5 Mount View into the Mount where is does not drain very well. A large sump was built under the drive to reduce the problem but this is not always adequate. Development and climate change would clearly make matters worse and this is not reflected in the report.

Having trouble using the system? Visit our help page or contact us directly.

Powered by OpusConsult